Sunday, December 9, 2012

Blogging Social Difference in L.A.: Week 10

This week’s post will be the last one for our project. I hope you have enjoyed reading about the different places in the Greater Los Angeles Area. To conclude this ten-week project, I decided to write about the city of West Hollywood. This is a very unique city located in Los Angeles County, and within the city it is very diverse as well.

For the first part of my visit I spent it walking around the vicinity of the Beverly Center prior to entering the shopping mall. I walked around looking at the residential area, the stores, and I also had lunch at a nearby restaurant called “Nonna’s Empanadas,” where they sold a variety of empanadas with dozens of flavors ranging from salty to sweet, including flavors such as Blue Cheese, Kimchi and also Chocolate Dulce de Leche. I noticed that the streets were very clean, the buildings were a bit older but well maintained, nothing special stood out for me, and there were very limited street parking. As for the multitude, the people seem to gather closer to where the shopping center was located, once removed from the fast food franchise and chain stores, there were less pedestrians to be seen.

Afterwards, I walked to the Beverly Center for a quick stop. On my way there, the brief 2 block walk, I encountered 3 homeless people. It is always shocking for me to observe the proximity between the poor and the wealthy and how even though they are on the extremes of the socioeconomic ladder they coexist in the same area. As I walk through the entrance passing the valet service, I see the numerous luxury cars parked indicating the class level of the people shopping at the stores inside the Beverly Center. The first stores I see when I get off the elevator are Louis Vuitton, Dolce & Gabanna, Coach and others. Moreover, inside the mall people were dressed extremely well most of them wore high end brands. Through the stores people shop, the cars they drive, the brands they wear are all “floating signifiers” that when seen tell a certain story about the person as we learned in lecture. These are stories society uses in order to organize our reality, to be able to put people into groups and have an idea of their background. Of course, these “floating signifiers” tell a general story, a stereotypical reality that is not applicable to everyone, but they are the details we grasp to form a general impression of someone.  Most importantly, these “floating signifiers” have a changing story, in other words, what they mean today was not the same 40 years ago nor will it be the same 40 years from now.

One of the main “floating signifiers” we learned during lecture was race, a concept discussed by cultural theorist Stuart Hall. Since race is not a physical division among humans, nor is it a scientific proven fact, all race is a society implanted “floating signifier” to put humans into different groups. Another “floating signifier” we touched upon in lecture was the concept of gender since it is a characteristic with a story attached. However, according to feminist theorist Simone De Beauvoir, “One is not born a woman, one becomes one.” The idea that we are not born with a certain gender, but throughout our lives we decide what type of person we want to be. According to Judith Butler, “Gender is not an essence, it is performed.” This brings me to the second part of my trip to West Hollywood, which took part during my drive down Santa Monica Boulevard. The 2002 demographic analysis reported that 41% of the city's population is made up of gay or bisexual men. Driving on Santa Monica Boulevard, I definitely noticed many rainbow flags raised which represents the LGBT pride, and also there were more gay couple holding hands on the streets. I especially thought the lecture on gender being a “floating signifier” was very relevant to this week’s trip. The idea of two men or women walking down the streets holding hands and sharing kisses would not have been accepted a few decades ago. Back then the idea of being a man did not entail having a relationship with another man, but as time passes and history changes so does the meaning of being a man. Therefore, when we see two men together, as gender is a “floating signifier” and the story is socially constructed, we can automatically accept the notion that they are a couple and the concept of homosexuality. Perhaps, through different mannerisms, ways of dressings or other details, we are able to get an impression that would not have been the same in another generation. As the significance of being a woman has been able to evolve throughout history, allowing women to have more rights and votes, as well as the rights and acceptance of homosexuals, hopefully in the future these progressions can also be applied to race. It is certainly a more difficult obstacle to overcome, since the history of racial differences is very ingrained in society and it is also one of the most conspicuous human characteristics that enable society to differentiate people, we also need to be reminded that in reality race does not exist and we are all equal. As one of the most progressive cities in the world, I hope Los Angeles is able to conquer this barrier soon.